Your commission structure is the single most important decision in your affiliate program. It determines who wants to work with you, how they behave, and whether your program is profitable at scale. Get it wrong, and you either overpay for low-quality traffic or underpay and lose partners to competitors.
The goal is not to offer the highest commissions. The goal is to design a structure that aligns partner incentives with your business economics -- paying more for actions that generate real value and less for actions that do not.
Core Commission Models
Model
How It Works
Operator Risk
Partner Appeal
CPA (Cost Per Acquisition)
Fixed payment per qualifying action (signup, deposit, purchase)
Predictable cost, but pays regardless of customer lifetime value
High -- guaranteed income per conversion
RevShare (Revenue Share)
Percentage of revenue generated by referred customers
Lower upfront cost, but long-term exposure
Medium -- requires patience but higher ceiling
Hybrid
CPA upfront + RevShare on ongoing activity
Balanced risk, more complex to manage
High -- immediate payout plus long-term income
Tiered / KPI-Based
Commission rates change based on volume or quality thresholds
Rewards quality, but adds management overhead
Medium -- motivates top performers
Setting Your CPA Rates
CPA rates should be derived from your customer lifetime value (LTV), not from what competitors are paying. Start by calculating the average revenue a new customer generates over 6-12 months, then work backward to determine how much you can afford to pay per acquisition while maintaining target margins.
A Forex broker with an average trader LTV of $800 over 12 months might set a CPA of $150-$250 per funded account. An iGaming operator with a $400 player LTV might pay $80-$150 per FTD. These numbers must account for chargeback rates, bonus costs, and operational overhead.
Start conservative with your CPA rates. It is easier to increase commissions for strong performers than to reduce rates across the board. Use tiered structures to reward volume without over-committing at the base level.
RevShare Considerations
RevShare models align operator and partner incentives because both benefit from high-value, long-term customers. However, the calculation base matters enormously. In iGaming, RevShare on GGR (gross gaming revenue) versus NGR (net gaming revenue, after bonuses and adjustments) can mean a 15-30% difference in actual payout.
Define your RevShare base clearly -- GGR, NGR, net deposits, or net revenue after costs
Specify what deductions apply (bonuses, chargebacks, taxes, payment processing fees)
Set negative balance policies -- does a partner carry forward negative RevShare months or reset to zero?
Consider hybrid models for new partners (CPA to reduce their risk) transitioning to RevShare at scale
Negative carryover on RevShare is a common source of partner disputes. If a referred player has a big win in month one, the partner's RevShare goes negative. Carrying that balance forward can mean months without payout. Many operators reset to zero monthly to maintain partner satisfaction -- but this increases cost. Decide your policy before launch.
Margin Protection
Every commission structure needs guardrails. Without them, a successful program can become unprofitable. Qualification rules, payout caps, and activity minimums ensure that commissions align with genuine value creation.
Set minimum deposit or activity thresholds before a conversion qualifies for commission
Use qualification rules to filter out self-referrals, duplicate accounts, and bonus abusers
Apply hold periods on payouts (7-30 days) to allow for chargebacks and fraud review
Review commission economics quarterly and adjust rates based on actual LTV data
Key Takeaways
Commission structures should be derived from customer LTV, not competitor benchmarks
CPA offers predictability, RevShare aligns long-term incentives, and hybrid models balance both
RevShare calculation base (GGR vs. NGR) and negative balance policies must be defined before launch
Start conservative with rates and use tiered structures to reward quality without overcommitting
Qualification rules and hold periods protect margins without discouraging legitimate partners